Monday, December 15, 2008

Hon’ble Union Minister Ambika Soni makes ASI Director a scapegoat to save herself

Hon’ble Union Minister Ambika Soni makes ASI Director a scapegoat to save herself

Sethu affidavit: ASI officer files case against Soni
Amitav RanjanPosted online: Dec 15, 2008 at 0010 hrs

New Delhi : An Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) officer, suspended last year for not carrying out changes in a counter reply to the Supreme Court on the Ram Sethu project, has filed a case against Culture Minister Ambika Soni and her senior officials for making him a “convenient scapegoat” to save herself from the public furore that ensued.
Seeking to quash the chargesheet against him, Chander Shekhar, Director (Administration) in the ASI, has told the Central Administrative Tribunal that the “purpose and motive of issuance of chargesheet is oblique and aimed solely at providing cover to the respondents in respect to the situation, which are their own creation, resulting in political fallout causing serious consequential repercussion to them”.
Shekhar, along with Assistant Director (Monuments) V Bakshi, was suspended in September 2007 for not incorporating corrections in the counter affidavit that set off a political storm, with the BJP accusing the UPA Government of hurting religious sentiments of Hindus in stating that there was no historical or scientific proof about the existence of Lord Ram.
Soni had then said her officers had made corrections, including deleting paragraph 20, which argued that mythological texts Ramayana and Ramcharitmanas could not be called historical records that “incontrovertibly prove(d) the existence of the characters or the occurrence of the events, depicted therein”.
According to Shekhar, the ministry’s Chief Public Information Officer Roopa Srinivasan, while replying to an RTI appeal for information on who carried out the changes, wrote: “No such information is available”.
“Thus, after one year of carrying out the claimed corrections in paragraph 20 of the draft affidavit, the ministry has now accepted that there is nothing on record to establish as to who carried out these claimed corrections in paragraph 20,” says Shekhar’s petition, which also names former culture secretary Badal K Das and ASI Director General Anshu Vaish as respondents.
Five days after the political outburst, the ministry had informed the Prime Minister’s Office saying that Joint Secretary RC Mishra, Das and Vaish, discussed and approved the changes in paragraphs 20 and 29 on September 6. Shekhar has said that only Mishra critically examined the draft affidavit, noting that “Paras 19 and 20 of the CA categorically state the stand of the ASI. This may please be seen. Source for the phrase ‘army of monkeys’ used in para 29 may also be ascertained”.
“It may not be out of place to mention that in the counter reply filed before the Supreme Court the words ‘army of monkeys’ pointed out by Joint Secretary stood deleted,” Shekhar says.
But, claims Shekhar in his petition, Mishra made no mention of the September 6 meeting on the file while he did so in an identical situation on the same issue less than two months before the controversial event. There was also no mention of the alleged changes by the Additional Solicitor General to the Court while seeking withdrawal of the affidavit, says his petition.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story_print.php?storyid=398460
MONDAY, MARCH 17, 2008

ASI’s reply to my RTI application: Speaking Order & the right to non-comply with directions

V. Venkatesan

My continuing Right to Information battle with the Archaeological Survey of India on why the Government suspended two officials of the ASI following the controversy over the Sethusamudram affidavit has elicited one more reply. This time, the then Appellate Authority who had earlier agreed with me and directed the Central Public Information Officer of the ASI to provide the information I requested, has been overruled by his successor, Mr.D.S.Gehlot, who appears to have recently taken over as the Appellate Authority in the ASI. Mr.Gehlot’s order dated March 14, 2008 is interesting because it says he found the order of his predecessor not a speaking order, not mentioning either the fact, or reasons and silent about how the said information would not qualify for exemption under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act.

The new order further says: “The Ministry of Culture has ordered an investigation in the matter and providing copy of the report submitted by DG,ASI at this stage is likely to affect the course of inquiry, which has been initiated under the CCS (CCA) Rules. Since the inquiry is still on, all the original papers related to the case are with the Ministry of Culture. The Nodal Officer of the Ministry of Culture was requested to take a decision about providing the information and take appropriate action. The CPIO Ministry of Culture concurred that the information related to the matter may be exempted under Section 8(1)(h).”

It adds: “The said exemption does not deny the information completely/forever but only till the matter is under investigation. The information sought by the applicant may be supplied as soon as the process of investigation is over.”

I agree that any order should stand the test of legality, fairness and reason. But I find the new Appellate Authority’s order difficult to comprehend. First, the RTI Act does not provide for amendment of order by one Appellate Authority by his successor Authority. Secondly, the failure of the Appellate Authority to provide a speaking order does not give freedom to the CPIO to non-comply with the AA’s order. If the CPIO is dissatisfied, then he should, one would expect, approach the CIC with a complaint or an appeal. But the Act does not contemplate that option to the CPIO. The Act is silent on this.

The Appellate Authority does not adjudicate between two disputing parties, in terms of hearing them. The AA simply goes through the RTI’s applicant’s appeal against the CPIO’s decision, and examines whether the CPIO’s decision was in conformity with the Act. In case the AA rejected my appeal without a speaking order, then how would I exercise my right of non-compliance with the AA’s Order? I have the option only appealing against the AA’s order, if I am dissatisfied. Therefore, to permit the CPIO to non-comply with the AA’s order, because it is not a speaking order, is likely to defeat the very objectives of the RTI Act, and its appeal mechanism.

Secondly, the new AA agrees with the Government that the matter is still under investigation, whereas one would assume that with the suspension order being issued against the two officials, and the Government having already submitted a revised affidavit in the Supreme Court in the Sethusamudram case, the so-called investigation must be already over. What sort of investigation is currently on? I am sorry to say the new AA’s order suffers from the same absence of “speaking order” which was cited to overrule the previous AA’s order. Once the report is submitted by the DG, ASI, it marks the completion of investigation, and the basis for the disciplinary action against the two officials. If the investigation is incomplete, then the suspension order must have clearly said, they were being suspended pending investigation. That was not the case.

Posted by V.Venkatesan at 6:46 PM

http://lawandotherthings.blogspot.com/2008/03/asis-reply-to-my-rti-application.html

40 comments:

美麗新世界 said...

愛情不是慈善事業,不能隨便施捨。..................................................

餐廳 said...

好文章就值得回響,如果可以常常看到您的更新,應該是件很幸福的事情~~ ........................................

陽明山花季 said...

你可以從外表的美來評論一朵花或一隻蝴蝶,但你不能這樣來評論一個人........................................

念強念強 said...

85cc成人片卡通免費下載a片韓瑜寫真aaaaaa片性愛遊戲正妹星球正妹空姐寫真正妹走光250av女優免費影片星野流宇星野殘紅星野桂星野愛利絲星野天堂星野優奈星野雅希寫真集星野美優影片星野美優寫真集星野美優短片美女 視訊999無瑪試看圖線上免費av影片台灣情網色嘿咻kiss168cu成人bt情色 網免費成人成人貼圖視訊聊天室土豆網韓劇播放打飛機專用網免費聊天室交友小魔女自天堂18成人動漫畫av女優免費做愛影片成人情色網戀愛ing聊天室卡通美女短片免費試看台灣18成年網台灣18成年人網

于倫于名 said...

pleasure to find such a good artical! please keep update!! ........................................

彭志文 said...

Time and tide wait for no man.......................................................

YoungW21087 said...

Nice Post~!!!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

茂恒 said...

很喜歡你的文章~繼續加油唷^^. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70713ang_eloknuth said...

爆乳潮吹裸體裸照裸女愛愛無碼尋夢視訊聊天a漫a片a圖一夜情一葉情人妻激情情色寫真美女自拍辣妹自拍正妹自拍美女走光辣妹走光正妹走光脫衣秀脫衣走光色情自慰自拍成人全裸打炮打手槍打飛機巨乳

GusF_Finkbeiner1209 said...

It's great!!..................................................

陳育政 said...

想像是什麼並不重要,想像能做什麼才重要........................................

佳蓉 said...

做愛 淫慾 s18x愛 寫真 77p2p 辣妹 淫婦 av 美女 美女聊天室 後宮聊天 打手槍 視訊 18禁視訊 貼圖 xPlus.av 援交打炮 女優 live173 173 85免費 uthome聊天室 一夜情 xvideo 免費視訊 情色聊天 交友聊天 影音視訊聊天室 情人視訊 a片

俊達 said...

路過--你好嗎..很棒的BLOG...................................................

子帆 said...

與人相處不妨多用眼睛說話,多用嘴巴思考,...........................................................................

hernande said...

不費勞力而得者,唯貧困而已..............................

jackveronic said...

the food is delicious!............................................................

溫淑芬 said...

Where did you purchase this product?.................................................................

林奕廷 said...

我的老天爺~內容真是太棒了.................................................................

陳芳 said...

Poverty tries friends.................................................................

江婷 said...

良言一句三冬暖,惡語傷人六月寒。.................................................................

靜宸靜宸 said...

It takes all kinds to make a world.............................................................

向霖向霖 said...

人有兩眼一舌,是為了觀察倍於說話的緣故。............................................................

吳婷婷 said...

天下沒有意把鑰匙,可以打開所有的門............................................................

竹青 said...

期待期待,期待您的更新啊!............................................................

姿柯瑩柯dgdd憶曾g智曾 said...

字是活的,人和環境的觀察是活的,思想是活的。不管怎樣,就是要有一兩樣是活的。否則都是平庸。............................................................

吳婷婷 said...

開懷幸福的生活,是每個人的夢想~~希望大家都能夠實現!...............................................................

王美妹 said...

大肚能容,了卻人間多少事,滿腔歡喜,笑開天下古今愁。..................................................

dawsonfelicia張君dawsonfelicia均 said...

多謝大大的分享......good............................................................

林彥以林彥以 said...

文章不求沽名釣譽,率性就是真的..................................................................

胡維倫 said...

It is easier to get than to keep it.......................................................................

陳筱黃世谷婷 said...

Learn wisdom by the follies of others.............................................................

駱李淑華明欣 said...

Lets cross the bridge when we come to it............................................................

家唐銘 said...

人不能像動物一樣活著,而應該追求知識和美德............................................................

黃信梅 said...

Readiness is all.............................................................

王辛江淑萍康 said...

You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person...................................................................

文瓊王王慧山 said...

過去的事早已消失,未來的事更渺不可知,只有現在是真實的................................................

承楊芸承楊芸承楊芸 said...

死亡是悲哀的,但活得不快樂更悲哀。............................................................

江趙雲虹趙雲虹仁昆 said...

這個部落格好好好~棒棒棒~~~............................................................

tongtong said...

生命的意義,是在於活的充實;而不是在於活得長久。............................. ...................................

惠NorrisBradwell041花 said...

這一生中有多少人擦肩而過?而朋友是多麼可貴啊!......................................................................